[Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#522558: Bug#522558: Unable to use any other protocol than iiop

[Pascal Giard]

Hi Thomas!

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Thomas Girard <thomas.g.girard at free.fr> wrote:
> Package: ace
> Version: 5.6.3-5
> Severity: normal
>
>> Hello Pascal,
>>
>> Pascal Giard a écrit :
>>> If i use a protocol other than iiop, the Naming_Service throws an
>>> error....
>>>
>>> e.g.
>>> $ Naming_Service -ORBListenEndpoints 'uiop:///tmp/mylocalsock'
>>> TAO (2512|3077675232) no usable transport protocol was found.
>>> (2512|3077675232) EXCEPTION, TAO_Naming_Server::init_with_orb
>>> system exception, ID 'IDL:omg.org/CORBA/BAD_PARAM:1.0'
>>> TAO exception, minor code = 11 (endpoint initialization failure in
>>> Acceptor Registry; EINVAL), completed = NO
>>>
>>> Failed to start the Naming Service.
>>>
>>> Same happens with other protocols i expected to be supported, namely:
>>> shmiop, uiop and diop.
>>>
>>> I've search the web and those protocols are expected to work with
>>> TAO... Am i missing something?
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply. Can you reproduce it with upstream TAO
>> version? I'm wondering if this is not due to IPv6 activation...
>>
>> I'll try to reproduce this and let you know. Bouncing this to Debian bug
>> robot so that this issue stays visible.

I didn't have to go that far... i must be misunderstanding something
as TAO's performance test named "Explicit_Binding" works. (I've taken
it from your orig tarball).
Note that they're overriding the protocol policy... it isn't passing
thru a Naming Service either.

Now i'm left wondering what i'm doing wrong or what i'm missing. I
wish there were examples using anything but iiop and/or that TAO's
Developer's Guide would be available for consultation.

-Pascal
-- 
Homepage (http://organact.mine.nu)
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)
LACIME: École de technologie supérieure (http://lacime.etsmtl.ca)