[Pkg-ace-devel] Question about path 10-fix-prj-install

[Marek Brudka]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Thomas,
W dniu 12.05.2010 10:11, Thomas Girard pisze:
> I've read [1] again; section 7.4 is exactly the ACE case -- even if we
> are no longer using libtool. There's no extra .0. Having a look at my
> /usr/lib, I see cases like the one you mention, but also some matching
> the proposal for ACE (e.g. libdb-4.{5,6,7,8}.so). My main motivation to
> switch to this scheme is that we indeed cannot guarantee that 5.6.3 is
> backward compatible with 5.6.2.
I just agree, this change is reasonable and once again should be
considered in the upstream.
BTW. Did you patch ACE service configuration framework to follow new the
convention?

Marek



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL6t3NAAoJED+r15Q8F6CG2j8H/RvhEsUoAfGyCtEQI7LB9crF
lXg+rO60A+GIOlGpIq+IxN+7Ky/pFPkvFF9UL42vbwNXyfQZ1d4xhwDHYGzMpv6G
ccsiALQFUCe2QUxeGc7GhvqKHAomO6vZtzvFrh4KJs8jkoOcapfrad2d3EfYCdl4
TKzTyRJIkA+TkCFJIs+QjIcGt+LFiK9pgPjLUyAN3LPJhqNU1NWSbZ3akfnQCqxh
+dxwxzuxHC/MgPpD/69ya89so5mxfSU9bSonVGZbQ72JmHudDvnDv6rk7KN9cYsO
qwekrlhxIfi+EFCRHXP8Ra8BYctEcK7q9VdJw5LS0qTsM3kDv18xrN4jnjoZYJ8=
=M2qF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----