[Pkg-ace-devel] [devo-group] [PATCH] Request for review on a new library versioning scheme (versioned_so=2)

Thomas Girard thomas.g.girard at free.fr
Mon May 17 19:31:11 UTC 2010


Hello,

Le 17/05/2010 09:23, Johnny Willemsen a écrit :
> The real disadvantage I see is that for debian package users things look
> different out of the box than for any other user. This is also another
> flag that has to be tested on various platforms, not doing that could
> cause problems later on. What about changing the behavior of
> versioned_so=1? With the symbolic link things don't change really for
> users, only for packaging we have todo some updates.

Changing versioned_so=1 would prevent the other, also valid, behavior.
Indeed another project might be using MPC only (and not ACE), and
use soname as an ABI versioning mechanism. I believe we need both
versioning schemes.

But I agree that for ACE+TAO compilation, versioned_so could be changed
to the new behavior so that:
  - everyone uses the same library names
  - the new mechanism gets better testing

Regards,

Thomas



More information about the Pkg-ace-devel mailing list