On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:52:33 +0100, Thomas Girard wrote: > The only way to work around this is to use gcc-4.4 on armel. Is this an > acceptable work-around, i.e. how long will gcc 4.4 be in unstable? > Yes please, it looks like using 4.4 is the way to go for now. Thanks, Julien