[Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#697848: NMU of ace ?

[Thomas Girard]

Hello,

On 23/01/2013 08:33, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Relicensing is probably the best solution, generally speaking, but I suppose
> it will come too late for wheezy.

Ack.


On 23/01/2013 09:08, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
>> Agreed, but I believe Sun intent here was to ensure that
>> standardization and implementation efforts (IDL to C++ and IIOP
>> marshalling rules) do not get ruined by code modifications. Yes, I am
>> interpreting.
>>
>> @Johnny: any opinion on this? See [1] for the context.
> 
> The intent of Sun is to keep IIOP mandatory in the code, but as far as I
> know we can ship the code without problems.

Ok, so assuming eventually ridlc replaces TAO_IDL, we'll still have the
IIOP issue.

Any chance to have this piece of code relicensed? How can we proceed?

Regards,

Thomas