[pkg-bioc] debian/ simplifications
David Vernazobres
dv at uni-muenster.de
Sat Apr 21 18:07:53 UTC 2007
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 09:47:38AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote :
>
> I made another change to r-cran.mk, and so far all packages 'just work'
> by only source r-cran.mk. The newest one was to have r-cran.mk grep for
> 'Priority: recommended' in the DESCRIPTION file and then switch to installing
> into /usr/lib/R/library/ (where reommeneded packages go) rather than
> /usr/lib/R/site-library/
>
> Are there other modifications we could or should address from r-cran.mk?
> The 'repositories' idea is also implemeneted. A few month ago I added
> inclusin of debian/overrides for Lintian, if found.
cool,..
>
> Also, I no longer include the basically empty postinst/postrm.
>
> Lastly, one thing I find confusing when building the few dozen r-cran-*
> packages I manually maintain: Sometimes an R package is NOT listed in
> Depends: yet required under pbuilder (probably due to LazyLoad or
> something).
well, in cran2deb I am still adding dependencies from time to time
manually. It's not a long term solution, but a solution.
> How reliable is the Depends/Suggests information in DESCRIPTION
> for us?
Well, very low I will say. But some packages' descriptions are very good.
So, it's a starting point.
All togethers, in my point of view, the quality of the
CRAN/BIOC/OMEGAHAT is not really good, but there is no other solution !
just my 0.02$,
david
More information about the pkg-bioc-devel
mailing list