[pkg-bioc] CVS %p

[Steffen Moeller]

Hi Dirk,

 I played with the title and have then forgotten about it ... sorry for that. 
The figure I did against your pledge in CVS since I needed to see what I was 
doing. Should I have changed something else ... well ... so I probably have, 
it was not intended to be perceived as some sneeky backdoor business.

The diff to my printout from this morning:

* s/really suggests/obviously fosters/
* The whole para "At this point, CRAN and BioConductor ...." I strongly 
suggest to merge with the description of R two paras above.
* s/is orders of magnitude/is considerably/
* s/data base/database/
* First para of "Technologh and Approach": s/functionality we 
added/functionality added/
* The enumeration below should start with capitals at each item
* just below: s/package \(that do/packages (that do/
* s/where needed, // and on the same line s/Depends/dependencies/
* The para right below starting with "This main step may fail" I suggest to 
rephrase as: "The database is steadily augmented as new packages
are introduced to the build process. Consequently, with packages
from separately treated repositories, inter-package dependencies may
not all be resolved when first starting the script." And maybe this bit should 
go elsewhere.
* s/at the end//
* s/\(not.yet.announced\)/shared/
* It should be either current state or {\em status quo}, I'd say, not both 
merged.
* Section "Status Quo and Open Issues", 2nd para, 2nd and 3rd 
sentence: "However, as of mid-May ... announced. The project would .... 
backup host" should be deleted.
* Following sentence: s/force these 1700/force all 1700/
* s/However, it/It/
* s/One obvious case is where packages require external libraries/Obviously, 
packages are difficult to handle that require external libraries./
* s/for each individual builds/for each individual build/
* Please fix the line below that one with the unfortunate "(Intel) x86 and 
(AMD) amd64" mixup of Debian platforms and vendor names.
* s/For the Debian packages/For Debian packages/
* s/generated\) ./generated)./
* s/separate folder of the publicly accessible folder on the CVS tree/separate 
folder of the publicly accessible CVS tree/
* Consider to remove the para "Information reuse" (low priority on my side)
* s/of the CRAN network runs/of the CRAN network run/

Steffen


On Thursday 24 May 2007 16:15:54 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 24 May 2007 at 13:52, CVS User smoe-guest wrote:
> | Update of /cvsroot/pkg-bioc/papers/useR2007
> | In directory alioth:/tmp/cvs-serv28989
> |
> | Modified Files:
> | 	cran2deb.bbl cran2deb.pdf cran2deb.tex
> | Log Message:
> | * Added simpler figure for build process but did not otherwise tamper
> | with the text
>
> That is simply not TRUE and I am getting, quite frankly, tired of this. I
> had asked REPEATEDLY for diffs, and not for clandestine checkins.
>
> You changed the title -- taking away the mindboggling fact that we haev
> 1700 packages. I will revert that.
>
> You changed a part of the intro (referring to a history we longer have, so
> this isn't too good) and I will revert that.
>
> The new picture is ok, but the caption needs rewording.  Will submit in a
> minute.
>
> | * ifthenelse-outed the other figure
>
> When I pdflatex it still shows up. Should it, or should it not?
>
> Dirk, not too amused



-- 

Dr. Steffen Möller
University of Lübeck
Institute for Neuro- and Bioinformatics
Ratzeburger Allee 160
23538 Lübeck
Germany
T: +49 451 500 5504
F: +49 451 500 5502
moeller at inb.uni-luebeck.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bioc-devel/attachments/20070524/1041c3f5/attachment.pgp