[Pkg-bitcoin-commits] [bitcoin] 100/126: Rewrite p2p-acceptblock in preparation for slight behavior changes
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Mon Nov 13 20:02:58 UTC 2017
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
js pushed a commit to annotated tag debian/0.15.1_dfsg-1
in repository bitcoin.
commit e976c36ddf183982d172da3127dc613111a25b42
Author: Matt Corallo <git at bluematt.me>
Date: Wed Oct 11 15:38:56 2017 -0400
Rewrite p2p-acceptblock in preparation for slight behavior changes
Removes checking whitelisted behavior (which will be removed, the
difference in behavior here makes little sense) and no longer
requires that blocks at the same work as our tip be dropped if not
requested (in part because we *do* request those blocks).
Github-Pull: #11531
Rebased-From: 3b4ac43bc371561b5fa559bccb17dc0702bd4b69
---
test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py | 236 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py b/test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py
index 27ae0c2..9b2c1a7 100755
--- a/test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py
+++ b/test/functional/p2p-acceptblock.py
@@ -4,42 +4,32 @@
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test processing of unrequested blocks.
-Since behavior differs when receiving unrequested blocks from whitelisted peers
-versus non-whitelisted peers, this tests the behavior of both (effectively two
-separate tests running in parallel).
+Setup: two nodes, node0+node1, not connected to each other. Node1 will have
+nMinimumChainWork set to 0x10, so it won't process low-work unrequested blocks.
-Setup: three nodes, node0+node1+node2, not connected to each other. Node0 does not
-whitelist localhost, but node1 does. They will each be on their own chain for
-this test. Node2 will have nMinimumChainWork set to 0x10, so it won't process
-low-work unrequested blocks.
-
-We have one NodeConn connection to each, test_node, white_node, and min_work_node,
-respectively.
+We have one NodeConn connection to node0 called test_node, and one to node1
+called min_work_node.
The test:
1. Generate one block on each node, to leave IBD.
2. Mine a new block on each tip, and deliver to each node from node's peer.
- The tip should advance for node0 and node1, but node2 should skip processing
- due to nMinimumChainWork.
+ The tip should advance for node0, but node1 should skip processing due to
+ nMinimumChainWork.
-Node2 is unused in tests 3-7:
+Node1 is unused in tests 3-7:
-3. Mine a block that forks the previous block, and deliver to each node from
- corresponding peer.
- Node0 should not process this block (just accept the header), because it is
- unrequested and doesn't have more work than the tip.
- Node1 should process because this is coming from a whitelisted peer.
+3. Mine a block that forks from the genesis block, and deliver to test_node.
+ Node0 should not process this block (just accept the header), because it
+ is unrequested and doesn't have more or equal work to the tip.
-4. Send another block that builds on the forking block.
- Node0 should process this block but be stuck on the shorter chain, because
- it's missing an intermediate block.
- Node1 should reorg to this longer chain.
+4a,b. Send another two blocks that build on the forking block.
+ Node0 should process the second block but be stuck on the shorter chain,
+ because it's missing an intermediate block.
-4b.Send 288 more blocks on the longer chain.
+4c.Send 288 more blocks on the longer chain (the number of blocks ahead
+ we currently store).
Node0 should process all but the last block (too far ahead in height).
- Send all headers to Node1, and then send the last block in that chain.
- Node1 should accept the block because it's coming from a whitelisted peer.
5. Send a duplicate of the block in #3 to Node0.
Node0 should not process the block because it is unrequested, and stay on
@@ -52,7 +42,7 @@ Node2 is unused in tests 3-7:
7. Send Node0 the missing block again.
Node0 should process and the tip should advance.
-8. Test Node2 is able to sync when connected to node0 (which should have sufficient
+8. Test Node1 is able to sync when connected to node0 (which should have sufficient
work on its chain).
"""
@@ -71,8 +61,8 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.setup_clean_chain = True
- self.num_nodes = 3
- self.extra_args = [[], ["-whitelist=127.0.0.1"], ["-minimumchainwork=0x10"]]
+ self.num_nodes = 2
+ self.extra_args = [[], ["-minimumchainwork=0x10"]]
def setup_network(self):
# Node0 will be used to test behavior of processing unrequested blocks
@@ -84,132 +74,149 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def run_test(self):
# Setup the p2p connections and start up the network thread.
- test_node = NodeConnCB() # connects to node0 (not whitelisted)
- white_node = NodeConnCB() # connects to node1 (whitelisted)
- min_work_node = NodeConnCB() # connects to node2 (not whitelisted)
+ test_node = NodeConnCB() # connects to node0
+ min_work_node = NodeConnCB() # connects to node1
connections = []
connections.append(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(0), self.nodes[0], test_node))
- connections.append(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(1), self.nodes[1], white_node))
- connections.append(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(2), self.nodes[2], min_work_node))
+ connections.append(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(1), self.nodes[1], min_work_node))
test_node.add_connection(connections[0])
- white_node.add_connection(connections[1])
- min_work_node.add_connection(connections[2])
+ min_work_node.add_connection(connections[1])
NetworkThread().start() # Start up network handling in another thread
# Test logic begins here
test_node.wait_for_verack()
- white_node.wait_for_verack()
min_work_node.wait_for_verack()
- # 1. Have nodes mine a block (nodes1/2 leave IBD)
+ # 1. Have nodes mine a block (leave IBD)
[ n.generate(1) for n in self.nodes ]
tips = [ int("0x" + n.getbestblockhash(), 0) for n in self.nodes ]
# 2. Send one block that builds on each tip.
- # This should be accepted by nodes 1/2
+ # This should be accepted by node0
blocks_h2 = [] # the height 2 blocks on each node's chain
block_time = int(time.time()) + 1
- for i in range(3):
+ for i in range(2):
blocks_h2.append(create_block(tips[i], create_coinbase(2), block_time))
blocks_h2[i].solve()
block_time += 1
test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[0]))
- white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[1]))
- min_work_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[2]))
+ min_work_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2[1]))
- for x in [test_node, white_node, min_work_node]:
+ for x in [test_node, min_work_node]:
x.sync_with_ping()
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 2)
- assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 2)
- assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getblockcount(), 1)
- self.log.info("First height 2 block accepted by node0/node1; correctly rejected by node2")
+ assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 1)
+ self.log.info("First height 2 block accepted by node0; correctly rejected by node1")
- # 3. Send another block that builds on the original tip.
- blocks_h2f = [] # Blocks at height 2 that fork off the main chain
- for i in range(2):
- blocks_h2f.append(create_block(tips[i], create_coinbase(2), blocks_h2[i].nTime+1))
- blocks_h2f[i].solve()
- test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[0]))
- white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[1]))
+ # 3. Send another block that builds on genesis.
+ block_h1f = create_block(int("0x" + self.nodes[0].getblockhash(0), 0), create_coinbase(1), block_time)
+ block_time += 1
+ block_h1f.solve()
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(block_h1f))
- for x in [test_node, white_node]:
- x.sync_with_ping()
+ test_node.sync_with_ping()
+ tip_entry_found = False
for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips():
- if x['hash'] == blocks_h2f[0].hash:
+ if x['hash'] == block_h1f.hash:
assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only")
+ tip_entry_found = True
+ assert(tip_entry_found)
+ assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not found on disk", self.nodes[0].getblock, block_h1f.hash)
+
+ # 4. Send another two block that build on the fork.
+ block_h2f = create_block(block_h1f.sha256, create_coinbase(2), block_time)
+ block_time += 1
+ block_h2f.solve()
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(block_h2f))
- for x in self.nodes[1].getchaintips():
- if x['hash'] == blocks_h2f[1].hash:
- assert_equal(x['status'], "valid-headers")
+ test_node.sync_with_ping()
+ # Since the earlier block was not processed by node, the new block
+ # can't be fully validated.
+ tip_entry_found = False
+ for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips():
+ if x['hash'] == block_h2f.hash:
+ assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only")
+ tip_entry_found = True
+ assert(tip_entry_found)
- self.log.info("Second height 2 block accepted only from whitelisted peer")
+ # But this block should be accepted by node since it has equal work.
+ # TODO: We currently drop this block but likely shouldn't
+ #self.nodes[0].getblock(block_h2f.hash)
+ self.log.info("Second height 2 block accepted, but not reorg'ed to")
- # 4. Now send another block that builds on the forking chain.
- blocks_h3 = []
- for i in range(2):
- blocks_h3.append(create_block(blocks_h2f[i].sha256, create_coinbase(3), blocks_h2f[i].nTime+1))
- blocks_h3[i].solve()
- test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h3[0]))
- white_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h3[1]))
+ # 4b. Now send another block that builds on the forking chain.
+ block_h3 = create_block(block_h2f.sha256, create_coinbase(3), block_h2f.nTime+1)
+ block_h3.solve()
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(block_h3))
- for x in [test_node, white_node]:
- x.sync_with_ping()
- # Since the earlier block was not processed by node0, the new block
+ test_node.sync_with_ping()
+ # Since the earlier block was not processed by node, the new block
# can't be fully validated.
+ tip_entry_found = False
for x in self.nodes[0].getchaintips():
- if x['hash'] == blocks_h3[0].hash:
+ if x['hash'] == block_h3.hash:
assert_equal(x['status'], "headers-only")
+ tip_entry_found = True
+ assert(tip_entry_found)
+ self.nodes[0].getblock(block_h3.hash)
+
+ # But this block should be accepted by node since it has more work.
+ self.nodes[0].getblock(block_h3.hash)
+ self.log.info("Unrequested more-work block accepted")
+
+ # 4c. Now mine 288 more blocks and deliver; all should be processed but
+ # the last (height-too-high) on node (as long as its not missing any headers)
+ tip = block_h3
+ all_blocks = []
+ for i in range(288):
+ next_block = create_block(tip.sha256, create_coinbase(i + 4), tip.nTime+1)
+ next_block.solve()
+ all_blocks.append(next_block)
+ tip = next_block
+
+ # Now send the block at height 5 and check that it wasn't accepted (missing header)
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(all_blocks[1]))
+ test_node.sync_with_ping()
+ assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].getblock, all_blocks[1].hash)
+ assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[0].getblockheader, all_blocks[1].hash)
- # But this block should be accepted by node0 since it has more work.
- self.nodes[0].getblock(blocks_h3[0].hash)
- self.log.info("Unrequested more-work block accepted from non-whitelisted peer")
+ # The block at height 5 should be accepted if we provide the missing header, though
+ headers_message = msg_headers()
+ headers_message.headers.append(CBlockHeader(all_blocks[0]))
+ test_node.send_message(headers_message)
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(all_blocks[1]))
+ test_node.sync_with_ping()
+ self.nodes[0].getblock(all_blocks[1].hash)
- # Node1 should have accepted and reorged.
- assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getblockcount(), 3)
- self.log.info("Successfully reorged to length 3 chain from whitelisted peer")
+ # Now send the blocks in all_blocks
+ for i in range(288):
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(all_blocks[i]))
+ test_node.sync_with_ping()
- # 4b. Now mine 288 more blocks and deliver; all should be processed but
- # the last (height-too-high) on node0. Node1 should process the tip if
- # we give it the headers chain leading to the tip.
- tips = blocks_h3
- headers_message = msg_headers()
- all_blocks = [] # node0's blocks
- for j in range(2):
- for i in range(288):
- next_block = create_block(tips[j].sha256, create_coinbase(i + 4), tips[j].nTime+1)
- next_block.solve()
- if j==0:
- test_node.send_message(msg_block(next_block))
- all_blocks.append(next_block)
- else:
- headers_message.headers.append(CBlockHeader(next_block))
- tips[j] = next_block
-
- time.sleep(2)
# Blocks 1-287 should be accepted, block 288 should be ignored because it's too far ahead
for x in all_blocks[:-1]:
self.nodes[0].getblock(x.hash)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not found on disk", self.nodes[0].getblock, all_blocks[-1].hash)
- headers_message.headers.pop() # Ensure the last block is unrequested
- white_node.send_message(headers_message) # Send headers leading to tip
- white_node.send_message(msg_block(tips[1])) # Now deliver the tip
- white_node.sync_with_ping()
- self.nodes[1].getblock(tips[1].hash)
- self.log.info("Unrequested block far ahead of tip accepted from whitelisted peer")
-
# 5. Test handling of unrequested block on the node that didn't process
# Should still not be processed (even though it has a child that has more
# work).
- test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[0]))
- # Here, if the sleep is too short, the test could falsely succeed (if the
- # node hasn't processed the block by the time the sleep returns, and then
- # the node processes it and incorrectly advances the tip).
- # But this would be caught later on, when we verify that an inv triggers
- # a getdata request for this block.
+ # The node should have requested the blocks at some point, so
+ # disconnect/reconnect first
+ connections[0].disconnect_node()
+ test_node.wait_for_disconnect()
+
+ test_node = NodeConnCB() # connects to node (not whitelisted)
+ connections[0] = NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(0), self.nodes[0], test_node)
+ test_node.add_connection(connections[0])
+
+ test_node.wait_for_verack()
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(block_h1f))
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(block_h2f)) # This should not be required
+
test_node.sync_with_ping()
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 2)
self.log.info("Unrequested block that would complete more-work chain was ignored")
@@ -220,27 +227,28 @@ class AcceptBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
with mininode_lock:
# Clear state so we can check the getdata request
test_node.last_message.pop("getdata", None)
- test_node.send_message(msg_inv([CInv(2, blocks_h3[0].sha256)]))
+ test_node.send_message(msg_inv([CInv(2, block_h3.sha256)]))
test_node.sync_with_ping()
with mininode_lock:
getdata = test_node.last_message["getdata"]
# Check that the getdata includes the right block
- assert_equal(getdata.inv[0].hash, blocks_h2f[0].sha256)
+ assert_equal(getdata.inv[0].hash, block_h1f.sha256)
self.log.info("Inv at tip triggered getdata for unprocessed block")
# 7. Send the missing block for the third time (now it is requested)
- test_node.send_message(msg_block(blocks_h2f[0]))
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(block_h1f))
+ test_node.send_message(msg_block(block_h2f)) # This should not be required
test_node.sync_with_ping()
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getblockcount(), 290)
self.log.info("Successfully reorged to longer chain from non-whitelisted peer")
- # 8. Connect node2 to node0 and ensure it is able to sync
- connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2)
- sync_blocks([self.nodes[0], self.nodes[2]])
- self.log.info("Successfully synced nodes 2 and 0")
+ # 8. Connect node1 to node0 and ensure it is able to sync
+ connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
+ sync_blocks([self.nodes[0], self.nodes[1]])
+ self.log.info("Successfully synced nodes 1 and 0")
[ c.disconnect_node() for c in connections ]
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-bitcoin/bitcoin.git
More information about the Pkg-bitcoin-commits
mailing list