[Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Litecoin package looks good

[Scott Howard]

On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob at member.fsf.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:15:15 Scott Howard wrote:
>> We probably should upload the ITP with a link to the repo and
>> explanation as to why it isn't uploaded yet.
>
> Link to new repository location is already in (ITP) bug report -- I updated it
> as soon as I moved package to pkg-bitcoin.
>
> I'm still thinking how to explain my reluctance to upload in ITP. Maybe I
> should close ITP? Or just leave as is? I'm not sure...

If you are no longer planning to package it, you could change the
title to "RFP". This way there is still a public record of your work,
arguments as to why it wasn't finished, and info on the repo. By
changing it to ITP it will no longer show up as a work in progress
(since it is no longer in progress).
~Scott