Bug#376860: [Bluez-devel] Bug#376860: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Bug#376860: bluez-libs: FTBFS on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-*

Samuel Thibault samuel.thibault at ens-lyon.org
Thu Jul 6 12:09:20 UTC 2006


Marcel Holtmann, le Thu 06 Jul 2006 13:20:27 +0200, a écrit :
> Hi Filippo,
> 
> > > > > bluez-libs currently FTBFS on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-* just because it
> > > > > uses a non-standard errno code EBADRQC.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm not sure about the right way to go: should bluez-libs, for
> > > > > portability reasons, use another error code, or should the Hurd and BSD
> > > > > add this particular error code.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know either, do hurd and kfreebsd support bluetooth at all?
> > > 
> > > The Hurd does not yet, but that's no reason (and I don't know about
> > > BSD).
> > 
> > It looks like a good reason to me, bluez is the official linux stack, other
> > kernels might use different bluetooth stacks.
> > However, I'm bringing this to bluez-devel to have more comments/opinions on this
> > and how it should be fixed (or not).
> > 
> > My best understanding is that EBADRQC is used in linux in a few places
> > ( http://lxr.u1i.net/ident?i=EBADRQC ).  Given that bluez is linux-specific I
> > might considering removing hurd and kfreebsd as architectures from libbluetooth,
> > would be that a suitable solution?
> 
> I dont't care what hurd or kfreebsd are doing. If you are not running a
> Linux kernel it makes no sense to have any BlueZ specific package.

Ah, I thought that a bluetooth protocol, although needing an ioctl
interface with bluetooth devices, would be generic (and it seems to be:
it compiles fine...)

Samuel




More information about the Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers mailing list