[Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Bug#565318: Bug#565318: Bug#565318: Bug#565318: obexd-server thought as the new implementation of the old obex-data-server

[Andrea Veri]

On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:

> I confirmed that obexd-server set it in Conflict in obexd.
> I think that DBUS-name doen't conflict now because user cannot install
> these at the same time.

Ideally the best thing to do would be to change the namespaces of the 
obexd-server package so that obexd-server and obex-data-server can be 
used together (if needed).

Anyway no GNOME package makes use of obexd-server at the moment, so I 
think that if you are not willing to make the effort of changing the 
namespace yourself, we can just keep the conflicts as they are and 
simply not using the obexd-server package since it doesnt provide what 
we need. You should report this issue to the obexd-server upstream, 
and see if they want to fix this issue or not. ( I don't think they 
will agree with us anyway)

cheers,

-- 

  .''`.
 : :' :   Andrea Veri <and at debian.org>,
 `. `'                <av at ubuntu.com>,
   `-                 <av at gnome.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bluetooth-maintainers/attachments/20100126/4de8fdd4/attachment.pgp>