[pkg-boost-devel] Bug#429533: Bug#429533: Bug#429533: Bug#429533: dev package changes and its severity
Domenico Andreoli
cavok at debian.org
Tue Jun 26 22:31:37 UTC 2007
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 05:30:21AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
hi,
> > Boost library naming is described in the documentation [0].
> >
> > [0] http://www.boost.org/more/getting_started/unix-variants.html#library-naming
>
> Which does not mean it is correct for libboost-*-dev to silently
> change its interface (.so library naming).
no, silently not. the real bug from my POW is that I did not announced
the change.
> Why not just provide -pthread version (-mt) per default and provide
> -st version for people who really care?
because using -mt versions in place of -st is suboptimal in a way i am
not able to evaluate. if building c++ as multi-threaded had a negligible
impact, -pthread switch would be the default.
moreover careful people is usually the one using multi-threaded stuff,
not the opposite.
cheers,
domenico
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
More information about the pkg-boost-devel
mailing list