[pkg-boost-devel] Boost needs help on ARM

[Bill Gatliff]

Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Ah.  I didn't know that.  Thanks.
>
> Is there any mechanism to prevent this in future?  For example, can
> boost be added to a list of packages that are not to be built on a
> netwinder?
>   

Netwinders et al. are getting really long in the tooth, and are pretty 
underpowered for this kind of thing.

Hedges is a good arm buildd.  I think it's got enough horsepower to do 
armel work too, but that's an admin thing.

As for developer machines, I've outspent myself putting up hedges and 
leisner--- and the latter is blacklisted right now because of the local 
root exploit kernel problem.  Anyone?


b.g.

-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat at billgatliff.com