[pkg-boost-devel] Package using boost.build v2
Steve M. Robbins
steve at sumost.ca
Mon Jan 21 03:37:53 UTC 2008
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:29:42AM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Very recently I started working on a package, mcrl2, that uses
> boost.build v2 as its build & install system. However, I ran into some
> issues and I hope that you can advise me.
>
> 1) The upstream tarball ships boost under 3rd-party/boost. This is
> quite a big chunk of source, namely 24MB. Would you advise for or
> against creating a tarball without this part and use boost-build
> and/or bjam from Debian?
I would suggest that you at least try to remove 3rd-party/boost and
build using the Debian boost libraries. This may involve some
patching to the build system, so you may find it easiest to first
resolve your build problems *before* removing 3rd-party/boost.
As far as your other questions go: dunno. I don't use bjam or
Boost.Build. My suggestion is to take it up on the Boost.Build
list; see http://www.boost.org/more/mailing_lists.htm.
Good luck!
-Steve
P.S. I'd be interested to hear the resolution of your relinking /
RPATH problem.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boost-devel/attachments/20080120/4b878e02/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-boost-devel
mailing list