[pkg-boost-devel] Bug#710211: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie
Steve M. Robbins
steve at sumost.ca
Tue Jul 2 02:56:12 UTC 2013
Hi Daniel,
I'd like some more information regarding these two bugs, where Boost
has defined but not used a local typedef.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:24:20AM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> severity 710210 serious
> severity 710211 serious
So a "serious" bug is defined as: a severe violation of Debian policy
(roughly, it violates a "must" or "required" directive), or, in the
package maintainer's or release manager's opinion, makes the package
unsuitable for release.
I looked through policy in vain for an applicable directive. Did you
have one in mind? If not, what is your rationale for this severity?
I can guess you are concerned that this compiler warning causes a
build failure for other packages that treat errors as warnings. I
agree this is a nuisance and will endeavour to fix the issue.
However, in general I cannot agree that this alone makes it "serious".
The build failure is caused by the package using -Werror. An easy
workaround is to add -Wno-unused-local-typedef for those packages
using Boost and -Werror.
Regards,
-Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boost-devel/attachments/20130701/b3162acb/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the pkg-boost-devel
mailing list