SBCL blocked at 0.9.16 in testing

[Thiemo Seufer]

Thiemo Seufer wrote:
[snip]
> > and then several architectures on which there are no binaries (alpha,
> > mipsel, sparc), but that shouldn't block the other architectures,
> > should it?
> 
> There _are_ binaries for these three in lenny, but not in sid, this
> blocks testing migration.
> 
> Given the bootstrap problem, we should IMHO rather get SBCL going
> again on those architectures than ask for removal of the 0.9.16
> binaries from lenny.
> 
> The current state (from a upstream perspective) is:
> - sparc should be fine. In Debian it fails due to a (unrelated)
>   ghostscript bug when building documentation.
> - alpha FTBFS, this is caused by a bug in the alpha support, fixed
>   upstream
> - mipsel fails because it needs to be re-bootstrapped from a newer
>   SBCL than 1.0.10. This was a mips/mipsel specific bug.

I re-bootstrapped mipsel now.


Thiemo