DF and signal handlers
Aurelien Jarno
aurelien at aurel32.net
Wed Mar 5 15:10:53 UTC 2008
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 03:48:05PM +0200, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
> On 3/5/08, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32.net> wrote:
> > Nikodemus Siivola a écrit :
> >
> > > On 3/5/08, Debian Bug Tracking System <owner at bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> tag 469058 + patch
> > >> Bug#469058: sbcl doesn't reset direction flag upon exit
> > >> There were no tags set.
> > >> Tags added: patch
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch, but... while I agree that it is good to change
> > > SBCL to reset the direction flag every time it is diddled, instead of
> > > just before calling C, I don't think SBCL is actually at fault here.
> > >
> > > 1. SBCL does actually reset DF before any call to foreign (GCC generated) code.
> > > See line 236 in src/compiler/x86/c-call.lisp, and line 125 in
> > > src/runtime/x86-assem.S.
> > >
> > > (It is possible I'm missing out a call-path here, but even so, read on and
> > > see if my fears are unfounded or not.)
> > >
> > > 2. If the problem was due to a foreign call, it should be deterministic.
> > >
> > > 3. If the problem was due to _returning_ to main(), it should be deterministic.
> >
> >
> > Looks correct.
> >
> >
> > > What I suspect is actually going on (especially considering your
> > > statement that compiling signals/ with 4.2 avoided the issue) is that
> > > a signal handler is entered while DF is set.
> >
> >
> > What I am sure is that sigemptyset() from the glibc is called with the
> > direction flag set, and that should not happen.
>
> Right.
>
> I'm about to merge a patch to SBCL based on yours, which moves all DF
> resets to immediate vicinity of STDs for easier auditing, and removed
> the then-unnecessary CLD instructions from foreign call sequences.
> This will fix them symptoms, and be good for SBCL, but I think the
> underlying problem is still there in signal handling. :/
>
> > > If this is the case, then clearing it right after each REP loop where
> > > SBCL uses it just makes seeing the bug much more unlikely -- but not
> > > impossible in the presence of async signals.
> >
> >
> > Seems correct, though I have made half a dozen of build here, without
> > any problem.
>
> That is not too suprising: the are normally no asynch signals
> delivered during the build, but SIGSEGV is a regular occurance (it is
> used by the GC), so SIGSEGV handlers may have been seeing the DF set.
>
> What _is_ strange is that this appears to have been random. (At least
> all the reporters seemed to characterize it as semirandom behaviour.)
> Multiple builds from the same source with the same host compiler
> should have essentially identical GC characteristics.
>
> > > If so, this may also explain some _very_ hard to reproduce faults we
> > > have seen over the years: using a pre 4.3-GCC compiled libc, a signal
> > > at an in opportune moment in the middle of a REP loop could clear DF!
> > > Yikes!
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what is The Right Thing here, though. Should SBCL (and
> > > _any_ program that ever sets DF!) save, clear, and restore DF in its
> > > signal handlers? Should libc/kernel do that? Should signals be blocked
> >
> >
> > I currently have no idea about that.
>
> I'll see if I can cook up a small test-case using async signals. (One
> that doesn't need SBCL so that it can be passed to upstream libc /
> kernel people if necessary without too much friction.)
>
The small code below exhibits the problem. It was there already with
gcc-4.2, but in that case, gcc generates a cld or std instruction
before any instruction that uses the direction flag.
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
void handler(int signal) {
uint64_t rflags;
asm volatile("pushfq ; popq %0" : "=g" (rflags));
if (rflags & (1 << 10))
printf("DF = 1\n");
else
printf("DF = 0\n");
}
int main() {
signal(SIGUSR1, handler);
while(1)
{
asm volatile("std\r\n");
}
}
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' aurel32 at debian.org | aurelien at aurel32.net
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
More information about the pkg-common-lisp-devel
mailing list