SBCL blocked at 0.9.16 in testing
Peter Van Eynde
pvaneynd at mailworks.org
Sun May 4 03:46:29 UTC 2008
Luca Capello wrote:
>> Given the bootstrap problem, we should IMHO rather get SBCL going
>> again on those architectures than ask for removal of the 0.9.16
>> binaries from lenny.
> Since manpower for the Debian Common Lisp Team is lacking (help is
> always appreciated), I think that we should maintain only the
> architectures we can provide support for.
I fear I must agree with Luca here. Some architectures break with ease
and we do not have good development machines for all architectures.
A token problem child is sparc. Before sperger.debian.org came along
for a long long time there was no machine available. And some build
problems only seem to happen on the buildd machines :-(.
In fact I was certain I had created a bug asking for the removal of all
unsupported architectures from testing, but I cannot find this bug now. :-(
I'll wait until the end of May. Any architectures not uploaded by
someone else will get removed, ok?
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave
More information about the pkg-common-lisp-devel