SBCL blocked at 0.9.16 in testing

[Peter Van Eynde]

Hi all,


Luca Capello wrote:
>> Given the bootstrap problem, we should IMHO rather get SBCL going
>> again on those architectures than ask for removal of the 0.9.16
>> binaries from lenny.
> 
> Since manpower for the Debian Common Lisp Team is lacking (help is
> always appreciated), I think that we should maintain only the
> architectures we can provide support for.

I fear I must agree with Luca here. Some architectures break with ease 
and we do not have good development machines for all architectures.

A token problem child is sparc. Before sperger.debian.org  came along 
for a long long time there was no machine available. And some build 
problems only seem to happen on the buildd machines :-(.

In fact I was certain I had created a bug asking for the removal of all 
unsupported architectures from testing, but I cannot find this bug now. :-(

I'll wait until the end of May. Any architectures not uploaded by 
someone else will get removed, ok?

Groetjes, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave 
Aronson|