pan pan pan

Peter Van Eynde pvaneynd at debian.org
Fri Aug 21 12:19:41 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello all,

Milan Zamazal wrote:
> I'm a DD interested in CL.  I maintain (although not very actively) a
> few Debian CL packages and I'm not going to give up on them, so I need
> at least common-lisp-controller (in addition to CL implementations) in
> Debian.

You're right of course. We'll keep clc and 'native' libraries. But the
others should go.

I also think that slime should go. Not that I don't think it is good
package that has its use, but because it is just so tricky to maintain
and I never have understood how to debug those emacs bugs :-(.

And I'm not stopping outright, it is just that I'm not doing enough for
all those packages, so I'll cut them right back.

Ah and darcs is gone for me a long time ago, all my packages are or
should be in git.

Groetjes, Peter

- --
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave
Aronson|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=p0oT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list