Desmond O. Chang
dochang at gmail.com
Fri Jan 7 02:38:46 UTC 2011
Hi Darren and Christoph,
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 20:43, Christoph Egger <christoph at debian.org> wrote:
> Darren Hoo <darren.hoo at gmail.com> writes:
>> I am wondering whether it is neccessary to integrate it with
>> since abcl is running on JVM, it does not have the schemes like other CL
>> implementations that support dumping core/image.
> Maybe someone else can help here?
c-l-c has been deprecated in sid now.
I posted a c-l-c redesign plan  last month. In fact, finally,
c-l-c will be *deleted*. So ABCL *should not* depend on c-l-c.
Generally, all the implementations, which have included ASDF2, don't
have to work with c-l-c and cl-asdf. For those not including ASDF2,
they can choose:
1. Build-Depends cl-asdf, then load it when compiling the image.
2. PreDepends cl-asdf, then load it when installing the image.
3. Depends cl-asdf, then load it when running the image.
4. patch asdf by themselves.
5. don't include asdf at all.
I don't follow mentors. Please CC your reply to .
Any opinion about c-l-c redesign please reply to that thread .
 pkg-common-lisp-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
More information about the pkg-common-lisp-devel