Bug#789515: cmucl: is the libxp dependency necessary?

Peter Van Eynde pvaneynd at debian.org
Thu Jun 25 13:42:34 UTC 2015


Hello Graham,

On 21/06/15 19:06, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Your package depends on libxp.  This situation sometimes arises
> historically from the time before xprint was considered obsolete, with
> Build-depends: libxp-dev being set in the past and then forgotten and
> untouched.

In fact upstream set a dependency on libXp. Removing it seems not to
impact the system, so I'm going to remove it in the next version.

This came about by the change from lesstif to the real motif libraries...

Best regards, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/
God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson|

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 989 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/attachments/20150625/8ef0c927/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list