Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license
Peter Van Eynde
pvaneynd at debian.org
Tue Apr 19 06:49:13 UTC 2016
Hello Dmitry,
On 16/04/16 04:21, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> The following files are licensed under non-DFSG compliant license:
>
> Files:
<all of PCL>
> License: Xerox-LUN
Checking the copy in sbcl for example is missing the clause, which I
think you object to:
> Any person obtaining a copy of this software is requested to send their
> name and post office or electronic mail address to:
> CommonLoops Coordinator
> Xerox PARC
> 3333 Coyote Hill Rd.
> Palo Alto, CA 94304
> (or send Arpanet mail to CommonLoops-Coordinator.pa at Xerox.arpa)
> .
> Suggestions, comments and requests for improvements are also welcome.
As the last release of PCL was in September 1992 and PARC stopped doing
common lisp, I think that no-one is listening for any emails anymore and
that we can simply remove this request.
Would you agree to this?
Best regards, Peter
--
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org
http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/
God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson|
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 989 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/attachments/20160419/bce9c946/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-common-lisp-devel
mailing list