Migration to salsa.d.o + git workflow

[Sébastien Villemot]

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 06:58:19PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:51:45PM +0100, pvaneynd at debian.org wrote:
> > > Sure, once we agree on a workflow, I am willing to document it (with
> > > command-line examples) on a wiki page.
> > 
> > You certainly have my blessing as you’re also doing most, if not all, of the difficult work!
> 
> I wrote the following page documenting in detail the proposed workflow:
> 
>  https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCommonLisp/GitPackaging
> 
> I also migrated the sbcl repository to salsa so that you can play with the
> example given in the wiki page.
> 
> Please read the page and tell me if this workflow is ok with you.
> 
> Then, unless there is something to be changed, I'll go ahead with the migration
> of all repositories to salsa (adapting the branch names in the process, and
> creating the pristine-tar branches).

I got no reply to my email above. Should I assume that the git workflow is ok
for the team and that I should complete the migration to salsa? (I already
migrated a few packages that I uploaded in the meantime).

Best,

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  http://www.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/attachments/20180310/3181b58c/attachment.sig>