[Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#378038: marked as done (cupsys: BrowseAddress @IF(...) doesn't work (manual specification does))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:33:03 +0100
with message-id <20120817213303.GC23049 at desktop>
and subject line Re: Bug#378038: cupsys: BrowseAddress @IF(...) doesn't work (manual specification does)
has caused the Debian Bug report #378038,
regarding cupsys: BrowseAddress @IF(...) doesn't work (manual specification does)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
378038: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378038
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Tyson Whitehead <twhitehe at uwo.ca>
Subject: cupsys: BrowseAddress @IF(...) doesn't work (manual specification does)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:40:56 -0400
Size: 4547
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cups-devel/attachments/20120817/a892979e/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Brian Potkin <claremont102 at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#378038: cupsys: BrowseAddress @IF(...) doesn't work (manual specification does)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:33:03 +0100
Size: 2674
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cups-devel/attachments/20120817/a892979e/attachment-0001.mht>