[Pkg-Cyrus-imapd-Debian-devel] RFC: Renaming the packages

[Benjamin Seidenberg]

> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote on 03/12/2005 03:34:
>> On Thu, 01 Dec 2005, Ondrej Sury wrote:
>>
>>>I think that we should keep versioned name, but prepare virtual
>>>packages:
>>>
>>>cyrus-imapd, etc. which would depend on latest cyrus-imapd-x.x packages,
>>>same as linux kernel packages and others.
>>
>> On the latest *recommended* packages for production use, you mean.
>> That's
>> 2.2, it will take quite a while for 2.3 get to that point after it is
>> released ;-)
>>
>> But *both* naming schemes are versioned.  We need you to chose *which*
>> schema to use:  cyrus##-blah or cyrus-blah-#.#.
>
> After thinking about it for a few days (well, not all of the time of
> course), I also would like to see virtual packages named cyrus-blah and
> packages for specific versions to be cyrus-blah-## or cyrus-blah-#.#
> (not exactly sure which I would prefer).
>

Of these, I would perfer X.x over Xx (the 3 key on this computer is
broken, I hate school)