RFC: Changing the way we handle sarge in the SVN

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> withdraw my suggestion. Now lets work on getting .13 released.  It's
> been working just fine on my server. I think the 12->13 delta is
> somewhat minimal, do we want to skip experimental and go right to unstable?

I'd say yes.  I don't think we will need experimental for 2.2 anymore,
unless we do something really strange.  We can just package to unstable
always.

As for 2.3, if we are to package it soon it *really* needs to go in
experimental, and we will have to work out of upstream CVS.  Just take a
look at the breakages currently fixed in CVS for 2.3 :)

That said, I'd strongly suggest keeping an eye on 2.2 CVS as well, it was
needed during the 2.1 days as CMU upstream does _not_ release often and you
want a bit less latency for some of the fixes that hit CVS.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh