debian/patches/20-drac_auth.dpatch

[Edward J. Shornock]

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Edward Shornock wrote:
>> While making my own custom version of the package (to include a few
>> patches from http://email.uoa.gr/projects/cyrus , I noticed this:
>>
>>
>>  imapd.quant: $(IMAPDOBJS) mutex_fake.o libimap.a $(DEPLIBS) $(SERVICE)
>>         $(QUANTIFY) $(QUANTOPT) $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o imapd.quant \
>>          $(SERVICE) $(IMAPDOBJS) mutex_fake.o libimap.a \
>> -       $(DEPLIBS) $(LIBS) $(LIB_WRAP)
>> +       $(DEPLIBS) $(LIBS) $(LIB_WRAP) $(DRAC_LIBS) $(DRAC_LIBS)
>>
>>
>>
>> Is $(DRAC_LIBS) supposed to be duplicated on that line?
> 
> No, it is a bug.
> 
> Actually, wasn't removing DRAC completely the consensus we reached a while
> back?

Yeah, I found this in my archives:


On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 02:32:06PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Sven Mueller wrote:
>> Actually, I have to agree.
>>
>> Does anyone know of any site which actually still uses DRAC?
> 
> No.  I am for removing DRAC support from 2.2 and 2.3.  2.1 must keep it, of
> course, since it is supposed to be in deep maintenance mode.

I would think that *most* people would use SMTP AUTH...