Sarge Backport

[Benjamin Seidenberg]

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

>On Thu, 09 Mar 2006, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
>  
>
>>Well, now that we're in testing (hu-rah!), we are eligible to have cyrus 
>>2.2 hosted on backports.org. I talked to nobse earlier, and he said 
>>there shouldn't be a problem with it. Henrique: you're apparently 
>>already in the key, so if we decide to go ahead and upload, can you do 
>>that for us?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>  
>
>>Everyone else: Should we upload to backports.org? I see no reason not 
>>to, and it's very obvious why we should, so I vote yes.
>>    
>>
>
>I will abstain, as I haven't tried using the packages well enough yet.
>
>But I am frankly scared of the ammount of complains about quota corruption
>in the cyrus-users ML.
>
>  
>
I've been running cyrus 2.2 on my personal server with no problems for a 
while now (since before I joined the team).

I think that if we have the package in etch, we might as well offer it 
to people on backports.org. It's not like we're replacing 2.1, they are 
given an option, and we might as well give them as many options as 
possible. Since it's in etch anyway, I don't see why this should be a 
blocker for backports.org

Cheers,
Benjamin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel/attachments/20060310/947cd4c5/signature.pgp