Bug#454498: status update?

[Costin Gusa]

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 20:21, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<hmh at debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Costin Gusa wrote:
>> It's almost a year since last message on this list, squeeze is frozen,
>> cyrus stable is already 2.4.4.
>
> 2.4.4 is in experimental.
>
>> Sadly, this makes me wonder not if we will see cyrus-2.3 in
>> testing/experimental, but if we EVER will have a modern cyrus back in
>
> No, we have decided to skip 2.3 entirely.  I am not junking the 2.3.16
> packages until I move production to 2.4 (which I won't do until 2.4 is a lot
> more stable), so either I or someone else might decide to maintain 2.3, and
> bring the "upload 2.3 to unstable" issue back to the table.
>
> But neither 2.3 or 2.4 are going in for squeeze, except as a
> (fully-supported) backports later on (I for one will need it).
>

Thank you for the update. Actually I have sent the question without
checking pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel@ first, which would have given
me the answer :)

As long as we have something newer, it's fine. Probably the OP wanted
the same thing at the moment of creating the bug and not necessarily a
specific version.

Is it ok to ask here about including uoa.gr autocreate/autosieve
patches or should I file a bug against the newly 2.4.4? (I just found
them prepared for 2.4.4 here:
http://www.vx.sk/download/patches/cyrus-imapd/)