[Pkg-db-devel] Bug#209778: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner@bugs.debian.org
Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:03:45 -0800
Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:12 +0100
with message-id <20050203120112.GO22702@mails.so.argh.org>
and subject line Package db4.0 has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 21:10:32 +0000
>From jfs@dat.etsit.upm.es Tue Sep 09 16:10:30 2003
Return-path: <jfs@dat.etsit.upm.es>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wouP-0006UG-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:16:17 -0500
Received: (qmail 5399 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:16:16 -0000
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:16:16 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <jfs@computer.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: jfs@computer.org
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <20030909201616.GA5392@dat.etsit.upm.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libdb4.0-util
Version: 4.0.14-1.2
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <20030620155309.GA7065@dat.etsit.upm.es>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 209778-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2005 12:01:21 +0000
>From aba@not.so.argh.org Thu Feb 03 04:01:21 2005
Return-path: <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cwffk-0004Yw-00; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:01:20 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B49584B;
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-65-187.mnet-online.de [82.135.65.187])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AD748661;
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease])
id 1Cwffd-0001ui-0b; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 13:01:13 +0100
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:01:12 +0100
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
To: 209778-done@bugs.debian.org, 276828-done@bugs.debian.org,
174284-done@bugs.debian.org, 179548-done@bugs.debian.org,
196944-done@bugs.debian.org, 277656-done@bugs.debian.org,
153067-done@bugs.debian.org, 157114-done@bugs.debian.org,
156330-done@bugs.debian.org, 155661-done@bugs.debian.org,
159100-done@bugs.debian.org, 160129-done@bugs.debian.org,
166620-done@bugs.debian.org, 186430-done@bugs.debian.org,
208211-done@bugs.debian.org, 223140-done@bugs.debian.org,
240638-done@bugs.debian.org, 157076-done@bugs.debian.org,
162458-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package db4.0 has been removed
Message-ID: <20050203120112.GO22702@mails.so.argh.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: 209778-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 15
Hi,
the source package db4.0 has been removed from Debian now. Therefore, I
close all related bugs.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C