[Pkg-db-devel] Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2

[Andrew Donnellan]

Ask the new DPL (aj) I guess.

andrew

On 4/10/06, Mike Olson <mike.olson at oracle.com> wrote:
> Dann wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your offer.  I think a relicensing would be the cleanest
> > approach.
> >
> > Note that I am a Debian Developer, but I do not speak for the db
> > packaging, release, or legal teams.  I hope that they'll jump in if
> > they are in disagreement with any of the statements I've made here.
>
> This is going to be some work for me.  Oracle's legal department has been
> very helpful on our open source requests so far, but it's a large team and
> is not familiar with this issue yet.  I'll need to find, then brief, then
> extract approval from, the right people here.
>
> Before I do that, can I get some kind of authoritative statement from
> Debian that the effort is necessary, and that it will satisfy the concerns
> that have raised this issue for the second time?  I want to be helpful,
> but I want to be sure we are solving the problem here.  To that end,
> direction from db, release or legal -- whoever can speak for Debian --
> would be good.
> 					mike
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-REQUEST at lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster at lists.debian.org
>
>


--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - ajdlinux at jabber.org.au
-------------------------------
Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au
Debian user - http://debian.org
Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
OpenNIC user - http://www.opennic.unrated.net