[Pkg-doc-linux-devel] Re: LDP "non-free" documents

[Emma Jane Hogbin]

--xs+9IvWevLaxKUtW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:50:57PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> As a Debian developer, I was about to draft a long response to Rick
> Moen.  If I may, I'll ask the Debian community of developers if there
> is a.) an official distinction b.) an official contact for such matters
> distinct and separate from the collective opinion of the debian-legal
> list c.) whether I can draft a quasi-official response on behalf of the
> Project.  Can you give me a day or so to poll Debian?

Of course. :) I am in an information gathering stage.
=20
> I can give the list my (unofficial,personal-but-based-on-experience)
> take on these matters but, since it is incredibly easy to propagate=20
> inadvertent misunderstandings / mistakes via email and mailing lists,
> I'd rather get some consensus before I come back - unless you'll take
> my (unofficial) word in the interim?

I am always interested in hearing peoples' words, but in this specific
case I am especially interested in hearing from the package maintainers
for the following packages:
	doc-linux-nonfree-html
	doc-linux-nonfree-text
It is my understanding they have the ultimate control over what files
actually go into a package.=20

thanks,
emma

--=20
Emma Jane Hogbin
I18N Coordinator, The Linux Documentation Project
www.tldp.org

--xs+9IvWevLaxKUtW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFCMKmnyklbvO2/Nm4RAnK8AJip84H4smLjfMhLTXU/aVnPyg9gAKC3aVa6
WofZ0A50sB41Q6rdgfQupg==
=2674
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xs+9IvWevLaxKUtW--