[Pkg-dspam-misc] Bug#577661: Bug#577661: Bug#577661: dspam: should this package be removed?

[Julien Valroff]

Hi,

We are in the process of reviewing packages of a recent git snapshot.

We still work on them.

Kind regards,
Julien

Le mardi 28 sep 2010 à 11:49:49 (+0200), Jan Hauke Rahm a écrit :
> unarchive 577661
> reopen 577661
> thanks
> 
> Hi Kurt,
> 
> I'm reopening this bug now as nothing seems to have happened.
> 
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:13:25PM -0400, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:21:53 +0200, "Jan Hauke Rahm" <jhr at debian.org>
> > said:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 06:33:31PM -0400, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
> > 
> > > > First, determine which of the uploaders still have an interest in dspam.
> > > > I think there are currently at least three people who would like to
> > > > contribute to maintaining official Debian dspam packages.
> > > 
> > > Are you going to pursue this, i.e. check on the other maintainers?
> > 
> > I have just emailed the uploaders to see if they can continue.
> 
> And did anyone reply?
> 
> > > > Second, continue with the development of the experimental upload.  I
> > > > think Julien is pretty close.  Since his work differs considerably from
> > > > the current package, I think experimental is still warranted.
> > > > 
> > > > Third, prepare an upload to unstable which takes the current package to
> > > > 3.6.8-10, fixing the RC issues and bringing it back into policy
> > > > compliance.  I will work on that, if Julien has no objection.
> > > 
> > > Sounds good. Any chance of a time line? Do you think this is something
> > > to be done within the next four weeks (and thus to be considered for
> > > squeeze)?
> > 
> > I am working on it now, with the intention of getting back into squeeze.
> 
> That didn't quite work out, did it? Admittedly, I didn't check behind
> the scenes, i.e. in VCSs or what, but there hasn't been an upload and
> I'd like you to keep this bug open now and close it with the next
> upload. I hope you see something like this happening in future,
> otherwise I still think a removal request might be better.
> 
> Hauke
> 
> -- 
>  .''`.   Jan Hauke Rahm <jhr at debian.org>               www.jhr-online.de
> : :'  :  Debian Developer                                 www.debian.org
> `. `'`   Member of the Linux Foundation                    www.linux.com
>   `-     Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe      www.fsfe.org



> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-dspam-misc mailing list
> Pkg-dspam-misc at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-dspam-misc


-- 
Julien Valroff <julien at kirya.net>
http://www.kirya.net
GPG key: 1024D/9F71D449
17F4 93D8 746F F011 B845  9F91 210B F2AB 9F71 D449
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-dspam-misc/attachments/20100928/c5d23821/attachment-0001.pgp>