[eclipse-maintainers] Eclipse 3.0 Packages

[Barry Hawkins]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jerry Haltom wrote:
|>| It seems like we are going to be relying on a lot of stuff in pkg-java:
|>| tomcat, ant, etc... Should I just get these put there?
|
|
| Best example of Engrish I think I've ever seen. I think I meant, should
| Eclipse just go in pkg-java?
|
| There is one source package (until Eclipse breaks apart SWT upstream, at
| least). It builds everything else.
|
|
Jerry,
~    I sent a message recently[0] to Joerg Wendland and the current
project team asking about the issue of packaging and our repository.  We
haven't heard back from Joerg yet, but he has been very busy finishing
his thesis over December.
~    There were reasons for breaking out the Eclipse-related packaging
activities; let's all come to an understanding on how/why we got to this
point before we assume that reversing that work is the way to go.

[0] -
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-eclipse-maintainers/2005-January/000004.html

Regards,
- --
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com

Registered Linux User #368650
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB4qv17bZ6kUftWZwRAgvXAKC/vUpoeE+8h+QAAd0qRCYTPde7zACffcRt
8Rx8AiCdruzIoZrCo5djrlw=
=LP8E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----