[pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] [Debian] Re: Eucalyptus 2.0.3 build

[graziano obertelli]

Hello,

On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:41:44AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 04:35 AM, Rudy Godoy Guillén wrote:
> > Hello, I'm subscribed finally. I'm currently the guy working for GSoC
> > project: Compute clusters integration for Debian development. Which means
> > using Eucalyptus for cross-building.
> >
> > Over the weekend I've sucessfully built the Eucalyptus 2.0.3 offline version
> > from upstream. Although I haven't checked the debian-related patches you
> > could have done (cdn.d.n appears down), I observed many issues that might
> > need some work.
> >
> > I have some comments:
> > - Do you guys have set a repo for the packaging bits?
> There is the pkg-eucalyptus subversion repository. The one on
> pkg-escience is outdated and the git one that Charles I recall to have
> created was never adopted, really. Correct me if I am wrong ....
> The packages we can IMHO directly upload to unstable - we should just
> submit some bug to it that prevents its migration to testing for the
> start. Once that is up, let me then upload a version to
> backports.debian.org.
> > - How will be versions handled, upstream says it's 2.0.3 but the changelog
> > isn't updated accordingly, so the resulting binaries are versioned 1.6.2.
> Uuuuuuuuh, please adjust the changelog, then :)

neil is the authoritative answer here, but I think that what is in our
sources is actually obsolete, and not currently used. Before working on
those you may want to wait for him to confirm that we want to work off
those.

cheers
graziano

> > - I've seen the work done by the Ubuntu people and I'm going to talk to them
> > eventually.
> Quite some of them I have now seen at OpenStack, so they won't have too
> much time for you. From what I recall/understood, most dependencies
> where co-developed by Chris.
> > Of course I'm willing to help on the team. I'll try to build from source for
> > armel this week,
> For your project this is not required, albeit nice for testing, obviously.
> We win when we have  the ARMel image run virtually on some Intel platform.
> > I've seen the Ubuntu guys already did. I'd like to know if
> > it works well.
> Best,
> 
> Steffen
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers

-- 
Graziano Obertelli
Eucalyptus Systems, Inc.