[pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] Eucalyptus 3.1 beta

[brian.thomason at gmail.com]

Thanks for jumping in Chris,

Yes, unfortunately, we are still using the same workaround by
generating the code and placing it in the actual source package. Our
alpha release of the packages can be found here:

https://launchpad.net/~eucalyptus-maintainers/+archive/ppa/+packages

-Brian

On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Chris Grzegorczyk <grze at eucalyptus.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Long time no say.
>
> Regarding #1:  It continues to be the same short coming we have had w/
> the source since 1.6.2.  The work around we employed in the past was
> to execute the build steps needed to generate the code (which is where
> the axis2 dependency comes up) and then publishing that as the
> upstream tar.gz.  Packaging axis2 or changing the codegen step are
> still huge tasks.
>
> Regarding #2:  This step (which used to be a wget of cloud-lib.tar.gz)
> will be skipped by the clc/Makefile if lib/bcprov.jar is present --
> thus, as we did in the past, the rules need to link the build-deps
> into clc/lib
>
> best regards.
> chris
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller at gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 06/10/2012 07:00 PM, Rudy Godoy Guillén wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Charles Plessy <plessy at debian.org> wrote:
>>>> Le Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 01:42:35AM -0500, Rudy Godoy a écrit :
>>>>> Hello, as you know there's a 3.1 (beta) version now available on github.
>>>>> I've been testing our build system with it and it works with minor changes
>>>>> and issues that I've been fixing, and commiting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, there are few things that need further discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1- Axis2 Java
>>>>> The Java lib is a build-dep but it is not in the repo. INSTALL instructs to
>>>>> download from Apache.org's servers. Policy doesn't allow such behavior, so
>>>>> how do we handle it? Do we package the library / talk with pkg-java? I've
>>>>> noticed the axis maintainer seems to be MIA.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2- git clone
>>>>> In clc/Makefile thre's a git clone for eucalyptus cloud libraries which will
>>>>> go against policy as well. Since they have migrated to github few days ago
>>>>> I'm guessing this will be addressed before release. So there will be room
>>>>> for addressing the situation.
>>>>>
>>>>>         @git clone --depth=1 git://github.com/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-cloud-libs.git lib
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm looking forward for your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rudy,
>>>>
>>>> can you list the problems in http://wiki.debian.org/pkg-eucalyptus ?  That may
>>>> help to track and solve them.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Done. Parts under /extra.
>>
>> It is a bit frightening. Anyway, many thanks for spotting that.
>>
>> Steffen
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers mailing list
>> pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Grzegorczyk
> Co-founder | Principal Architect | www.eucalyptus.com
> 805.807.8237 | #eucalyptus freenode | @grrrze
> 6755 Hollister Ave Suite 200 | Goleta, CA | 93117
> ________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers