Bug#341172: [Evolution] Bug#341172: evolution experimental fails to build from source

[Scott Anderson]

--- Loic Minier <lool at dooz.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Scott Anderson wrote:
> > I'm attaching the build log again.
> 
>  That one is *very* different.  I didn't see the same errors in the
>  first log you sent.
> 
>  Configure says you're missing iconv development files, which are in
>  libc6-dev.  (It also says you don't have jw installed, which is in
>  docbook-utils, but your problem is probably another one.)

I was missing docbook-utils.  I'm installing it now.

> 
>  Do you have libc6-dev installed?
> 

# apt-cache policy libc6-dev
libc6-dev:
  Installed: 2.3.5-8.1
  Candidate: 2.3.5-8.1
  Version table:
 *** 2.3.5-8.1 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.3.5-8 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
     2.3.2.ds1-22 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages


>  The actual error you're having in the build seems to imply one of:
>  - GnomePilotRecord isn't defined correctly (for example
>    libgnome-pilot2-dev isn't installed)

# apt-cache policy libgnome-pilot2-dev
libgnome-pilot2-dev:
  Installed: 2.0.12-1.4
  Candidate: 2.0.12-1.4
  Version table:
 *** 2.0.12-1.4 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
        900 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2.0.12-1.2 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages

>  - unpack_Address isn't defined correctly (for example libpisock-dev
>    isn't installed)
> 

libpisock-dev:
  Installed: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3
  Candidate: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3
  Version table:
 *** 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org experimental/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     0.11.8-15 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
     0.11.8-12 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
     0.11.8-10 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages


>  Evolution build-depends on both of these, I suppose you have them
>  installed, however they were uploads of libpisock-dev recently:
>     <http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pilot-link.html>
> 
>  Could you try downgrading pilot-link packages?  What version are you
>  using?

I'll try downgrading pilot-link to unstable.

# apt-cache policy pilot-link
pilot-link:
  Installed: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3
  Candidate: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3
  Version table:
 *** 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-3 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org experimental/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     0.11.8-15 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
     0.11.8-12 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
     0.11.8-10 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages

 
>  If you know of any upstream patch for this problem, send it in.
> 

From: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/garnome-list/2005-September/msg00054.html

On 9/8/05, Bob Kashani <bobk ocf berkeley edu> wrote:

...

The pilot-link-0.12 patches are now in garnome-2.12.0 so all you need to
do is uncomment the PATCHFILES line in evolution, gnome-pilot, and
gnome-pilot-conduits and roll on... :)

Bob

...

 ==> Running checksum on port-to-pilot-link-0.12.diff
*** GAR GAR GAR!  port-to-pilot-link-0.12.diff not in checksums file!  GAR GAR GAR! ***
make: *** [checksum-port-to-pilot-link-0.12.diff] Error 1

Looks like you have to manually add the checksum unless I missed something
$ md5sum download/port-to-pilot-link-0.12.diff >> checksums

Norm


	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com