[Evolution] Re: Making libcamel a versioned lib

[Øystein Gisnås]

ons, 14,.06.2006 kl. 00.20 -0600, skrev P Sankar:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 14:44 +0000, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> > I've discussed with Harish about the reasons why libcamel isn't
> > versioned. He found none, and thought it was good policy to change that.
> > At a couple of Wednesday IRC meetings, he promised to try to get this
> > change committed. I cannot see it in CVS yet, and humbly request that
> > one of you, or someone else apply it.
> 
> We are also eager about versioning Camel. As mentioned by Partha on IRC,
> we thought that it will be better if we start this from 2.8  We have
> planned that we will version camel, when 2.8 stable branch build is
> released. Any reasons why you need this before that?

I didn't make myself clear on that, but I didn't want to ask for you to
apply this on the 2.6 branch. 2.8 is good for us, but thought the policy
was to integrate changes on the 2.7 branch as soon as possible to
maximise testing efforts, but that's up to you.

I was just afraid that it would be forgotten in the end, and when 2.8 is
released, it's a bit late..

Thanks,
Øystein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-evolution-maintainers/attachments/20060614/15e08803/attachment.pgp