[Pkg-exppsy-maintainers] Licensing

[Per B. Sederberg]

Soeren is the author of the shogun-toolbox, so we can guess where he
falls on that one.

P

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Michael Hanke <michael.hanke at gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe one more ;)
>
>
>  On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:27:18AM -0500, Per B. Sederberg wrote:
>  > >  I hope that plan is acceptable for all of us. The last thing I want it
>  > >  to prevent somebody from contributing something, because we have a
>  > >  license that is too permissive ;-)
>  > >
>  >
>  > Completely acceptable!
>  >
>  > >  But I take this discussion as a brainstorming about how to do it best
>  > >  (in every respect) and not as an attempt to find an immediate solution
>  > >  to a serious problem, right?
>  > >
>  >
>  > Correct on all accounts!  I'm trying to work through all the
>  > possibilities and this has helped a lot.  I look forward to hearing
>  > the news post-nipy meeting.
>  I just stumbled upon a paper once more, that is of special interest in
>  the licensing debate:
>
>  http://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/volume8/sonnenburg07a/sonnenburg07a.pdf
>
>
>
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Michael
>
>  --
>  GPG key:  1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
>  http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke
>  ICQ: 48230050
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Pkg-exppsy-maintainers mailing list
>  Pkg-exppsy-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
>  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-exppsy-maintainers
>