[Pkg-exppsy-maintainers] The future of PyEPL

Tue Jan 29 20:58:06 UTC 2008

> then the likelihood of working with pyglet drops even more.  That
> should not be reason alone for us to package pyglet up, but they do
> feed off one another.  For example, if I know there's a debian package
> and I can easily experiment with pyglet, then it increases the
> likelihood that I would not be able to take pygame anymore and would
> feel compelled to push towards the new pyglet-based pyepl version.

> Does anyone else have any additional thoughts?
modularize pyepl code so it could use either pygame or pyglet? ;-)

-- 
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student  Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
        101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW:     http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik