[pkg-fgfs-crew] Bug#797944: simgear: library transition needed with	GCC 5 as default
    Julien Cristau 
    jcristau at debian.org
       
    Thu Sep  3 20:32:16 UTC 2015
    
    
  
Source: simgear
Version: 3.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-gcc at lists.debian.org
Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11
Hi,
your library exposes std::string or std::list in its public API, and
therefore the library package needs to be renamed.
Cheers,
Julien
The following is a form letter:
Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries.
Packages which are built with g++-5 are using the new ABI.  Libraries built
from this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, and
dropping other symbols.  If these symbols are part of the API of the library,
then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition for the library.
What is needed:
 - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5. Note that most likely all C++
   libraries within the build dependencies need a rebuild too. You can
   find the log for a rebuild in
     https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150813/
   Search for "BEGIN GCC CXX11" in the log.
 - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the
   library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the
   library.
 - If there are no symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 in the symbols
   forming the library API, you should close this issue with a short
   explanation.
 
 - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
   maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
   break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
   against these packages.
 - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change.
   Rename the library package, append "v5" to the name of the package
   (e.g. libfoo2 -> libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you
   have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the
   renamed package.  Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark
   this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a
   package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions
   triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and
   properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to
   control at bugs.debian.org:
   
     user release.debian.org at packages.debian.org
     usertag <this issue> + transition
     block <this issue> by 790756
     reassign <this issue> release.debian.org
   
 - If unsure if a transition is needed, please tag the issue with help
   to ask for feedback from other Debian developers.
The libstdc++6 transition will be a large one, and it will come with a
lot of pain.  Please help it by preparing the follow-up transitions.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_ABI_transition
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fgfs-crew/attachments/20150903/23e0155b/attachment.sig>
    
    
More information about the pkg-fgfs-crew
mailing list