[Pkg-firebird-general] lintian reports for firebird2 packages

[raseesink@hotpop.com]

>I think (probably Greg too) that we should name FB 1=2E5 package
>not firebird2 but simply firebird=2E Especially that firebird 1=2E5 is no=
t
>firebird 2,
>just firebird 1=2E5=2E So when there will be firebird 3=2E1 we should mak=
e
>firebird3?
>And firebird 1=2E03 still have security bugs=2E So what for somebody woul=
d
>want to use it?
>Grzegorz? What you think about it?

I don't see us solving the security bugs=2E So I wouldn't mind this=2E We =
could
provide unofficial 1=2E0=2E3 debs on firebird=2Edebian=2Enet=2E That way w=
e avoid
having open security debs in debian and have a solution for the people
really needing it=2E

Another issue I found: there should be libgds symlinks in /usr/lib to, not=

only in /usr/lib/firebird2/lib=2E A non debian app (ibaccess) just failed
after upgrading to 1=2E5=2E Putting back a symlink in /usr/lib fixes that=2E=
 It
also seems to work fine which is good news for backwards lib compatibility=
=2E

Cheers,
Remco=2E

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web=2Ecom/ =2E