[Pkg-freevo-maint] freevo and freevo-common

[A Mennucc]

Georg W. Leonhardt ha scritto:
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.01.2008, 16:33 +0100 schrieb A Mennucc:
>> hi
>>
>> what is the rationale in having two 
>> packages 'freevo' and 'freevo-common' ?
> 
> At this time it´s actually not necessary to have two packages, but I
> thought if freevo in future need a arch depending package it´s not
> necessary to introduce a *.all package.

proposal:

'freevo-common' : creates 'freevo' user, sets up all permissions

'freevo-box' : contains /etc/init.d stuff

'freevo-common' and 'freevo-box' may be generated from a different
source than 'freevo' . In the future we may have a freevo2 package as
well as freevo1 ; so 'freevo-common' and 'freevo-box' would be common to
to the two, that is , each 'freevo' package will depend on
'freevo-common', and 'freevo-box' will depend on any of them.

By usual naming convention, arch independent stuff would go into
'freevo-data'.
We will add 'freevo-data' if arch dependent stuff is evere added to the
'freevo' source.

Would this be OK?

a.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-freevo-maint/attachments/20080113/33ff8cb0/attachment.pgp