[pkg-fso-maint] fso-config-gta02 is ready! (was Re: [pkg-common-lisp-commits] [SCM] openmoko-files, various files for the Openmoko devices branch, master, updated. upstream/20080911-1-g9e8ed5d)

Joachim Breitner nomeata at debian.org
Fri Oct 10 07:35:03 UTC 2008


Hi,

Am Freitag, den 10.10.2008, 01:33 +0200 schrieb Luca Capello:
> > +++ b/debian/control
> [...]
> > +Package: fso-config-gta02
> > +Architecture: all
> > +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, fso-frameworkd (>= 0.2.0-git20080909-7)
> > +Conflicts: fso-frameworkd (<< 0.2.0-git20080909-6)
> 
> This is my first time with a versioned conflict/dependency, so I'm not
> sure how to handle it.  Can anyone confirm it's correct, please?

Do you really need the conflict against the lower version when there is
a dependency on the higher one?

Upgrades won’t be smooth unless you handle the removal of the conffile
in fso-frameworkd: Check in postinst whether you are upgrading from a
version with /etc/frameworkd.conf, and if it wasn’t modified, delete it.
If it was modified by the user, rename it. (This is rough knowledge,
better ask on #debian-devel). Or we don’t care too much about smooth
upgrades yet, considering the number and knowledge of our users.

Greetings,
Joachim
-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20081010/205631e0/attachment.pgp 


More information about the pkg-fso-maint mailing list