[pkg-fso-maint] [Pkg-e-devel] pkg-e stack update for freerunner?
Nikita V. Youshchenko
yoush at debian.org
Sun Feb 22 12:17:05 UTC 2009
> > I still thing it is ugly to have libevas-0.9.9.050b together with
> > libevas-0.9.9.050a-engines.
> > We should rename back to libevas-engines, or rename to
> > libevas-0.9.9.050b-engines.
> I did the latter yesterday.
I think your change is incomplete.
You should also add Conflicts/Replaces with 050a version, or upgrade will
> You might be interested in subscribing to
> pkg-e-commits , it's relatively low-traffic and that probably would
> make it easier for you to track changes.
Thanks for the hint, will subscribe.
> > Using unversioned libevas-engines name may be better because other
> > packages have to depend on it, so versioned libevas-engines name makes
> > maintaince of those a bit harder (e.g. have to fix debian/control
> > instead of just rebuild).
> > What do you think?
> I completely agree. In fact, I was about to make the same proposal. I'll
> do the changes today
Ok, waiting for that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20090222/802ca76c/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-fso-maint