[pkg-fso-maint] Status Update of SHR stuff

[Sebastian Reichel]

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:02:50AM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:50:13PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > > > Attached is a proposed postinst which should preserve comments,
> > > > > reordered lines and other oddities, while not being too ugly,
> > > > > IMHO.
> > > >
> > > > Cool :)
> > > >
> > > > Although still may be not correct - it will produce invalid result
> > > > e.g. if file contains groups after [local] and vars either don't
> > > > exist or exist in other groups.
> > > >
> > > > Still making it perfect is not RC so I'm going to upload the package
> > > > now.
> > >
> > > Not yet unfortunately:
> > >
> > > .../libphone-utils> lintian
> > > libphone-utils_0.1+git20091114-3_i386.changes W: libphone-utils
> > > source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token
> > > debian/libphone-utils0.postrm
> > > W: libphone-utils source: newer-debconf-templates
> > > E: libphone-utils0: postrm-should-call-ldconfig
> > > usr/lib/libphone-utils.so.0.0.0
> > > W: libphone-utils0: postrm-does-not-purge-debconf
> >
> > I should have run lintian myself after these small changes (only did
> > before <_<). Anyway, its fixed now.
> 
> .../libphone-utils> lintian libphone-utils_0.1+git20091114-4_i386.changes
> W: libphone-utils-dev: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date
> W: libphone-utils0-dbg: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date
> W: libphone-utils0: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date
> 
> Why not using 'dch' ?..

mh strange, lintian didn't warn me about this one. Using vim
copy&paste is just a bad habit of mine :( Anyway, it's fixed.

-- Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20091117/0ca49b14/attachment.pgp>