[pkg-fso-maint] package name collision; was: Re: neon_1.0.0-4_i386.changes is NEW

[Laszlo Boszormenyi]

Hi all,

On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 12:22 +0000, Archive Administrator wrote:
> (new) neon_1.0.0-4.diff.gz extra graphics
> (new) neon_1.0.0-4.dsc extra graphics
> (new) neon_1.0.0-4_all.deb extra graphics
> Image Viewer for Openmoko Freerunner
>  Simple, lightweight and fast image viewer written in
>  Python/EFL. Some of it's features are:
 The name 'neon' is already used by an HTTP and WebDAV client library,
with a C interface[1].
I have packaged it[2][3] and already in the archives for some time.
Would it be right to have two packages with the same name? Can you
please talk with your upstream?

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://www.webdav.org/neon/
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/neon27.html
[3] http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/neon26.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20091122/02ed735c/attachment.pgp>