[pkg-fso-maint] package name collision; was: Re: neon_1.0.0-4_i386.changes is NEW

[Laszlo Boszormenyi]

On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 18:40 +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> >  The name 'neon' is already used by an HTTP and WebDAV client library,
> > with a C interface[1].
> > I have packaged it[2][3] and already in the archives for some time.
> > Would it be right to have two packages with the same name? Can you
> > please talk with your upstream?
> 
> Hmm, sorry for that...
> 
> Are you ok if we rename package to neon-image-viewer ?
 Yes, that would be fine for me. Neon is definitely not, as I may add a
virtual package named neon to depend on the newest version of
neon2{4578} package.

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS