[pkg-fso-maint] libphone-utils and python-phoneutils are ready for sponsoring

[Nikita V. Youshchenko]

Hi

> > *) No -dbg package.
>
> done!
>
> > *) README.Debian
>
> I applied both changes (high prio and changed README.Debian).

Unfortunately there is one more problem, and of higher severity. Shame on 
me that I did not notice it during the first look.

Policy sec 8.2 explicitly disallows putting unversioned support files in 
shared library package.So having /etc/phone-utils.conf in libphone-utils0 
violates policy. It is "should", not "must" clause violated, but still not 
good.

And unfortunately I can't immediately advice what to do. Separate -common 
package with a single several-byte config file is a nonsence. Maybe ask in 
debian-devel@ ?

Possible solution could be having a -common package for entire FSO stack. 
That could take what is currently in fso-config-gta02, also 
this /etc/phone-utils.conf, likely something more. Additional argument for 
this is that settings in FSO stack are used by several components.

Nikita
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20090927/7faa5d66/attachment.pgp>