[pkg-fso-maint] phoneui-apps_0.1+git20100801-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Fri Aug 6 15:19:23 UTC 2010

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 08:24:52AM +0300, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>2010/8/6 Archive Administrator <installer at ftp-master.debian.org>:
>> Accepted:
>> phoneui-apps_0.1+git20100801-1.debian.tar.gz
>Congrats, the stack is in!


>Could you or someone list packages that could be now cleaned from
>http://pkg-fso.nomeata.de/sid/allpackages , so that we would get a
>better view (on that page) on "where we are"? Probably at least
>libphone* and phone*, but also libfso* and libframework*? fso-*
>however seems to be newer than in official archives and partially
>missing, so that would be left alone.

The graph at http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianFSO#FSO.2B-SHRstack has 
been updated to reflect above.

I find it odd (and mentioned brifly in the past) that config files 
packages depend on code packages.  I suspect it would be better to 
reverse that: have fso-config-* (and fso-sounds-*) depend on 
fso-frameworkd.  And/or whatever other code also using the 

Similarly, it seems to me that phoneuid should depend on phoneui-apps 
rather than the other way around: I imagine the apps can in principle be 
executed on their own - and thus another daemon or interface can make 
use of them and they should only recommend their default invoker 

Kind regards,

  - Jonas

  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fso-maint/attachments/20100806/5b5630bf/attachment.pgp>

More information about the pkg-fso-maint mailing list